Our Football, Our Future: Part I
Administrator on 10 August 2009 in Crocketteers.com, Expansion, Major League Soccer, San Antonio, Spurs Sports & Entertainment, Stadium, USLTo USL, or not to USL, that is the question.
Definitely not an easy task bringing a professional franchise to San Antonio, let alone a franchise that might not be accepted by everyone. And lack of support has already brought a premature death to the world’s most popular sport in this city. But as the reports continue to surface of a USL-1 club in the works to be granted to San Antonio I have a few questions.
Should we settle for a USL-1 team?
Appropriately enough, Spurs Sports & Entertainment is in negotiations to bring a United Soccer League-1 (USL-1) team into San Antonio, as an MLS team proved to be too expensive. I for one understand the logic, let’s start small and see where that leads us . . . . right? But where will that lead us?
The Seattle Sounders were lucky enough to be promoted but they have a rich history of the sport existing in the city for almost a decade now. The Sounders had both things necessary for success going for them, an ownership group who was dedicated and was willing to spend the money needed to fund the establishment of the franchise, and a fanbase that was mad for the game, and clearly mad for the team.
The MLS is not in the business of promoting teams from the USL-1 unless they are in a city that has the resources to support a major professional team.
So if we can’t support a major professional team now, what makes us think we can support a major professional team in the future? I don’t want to seem like I’m being negative, I think the USL-1 in SA is a good thing, don’t get me wrong.
But I honestly think that SS&E and the city are not exploring all available options.
Reading an article from Match Fit USA I realized that the politics of bringing an MLS team to a city is rather complex, and often times quite ruthless. The article reported that DC United could be moved from Washington, DC if they didn’t build a new soccer specific stadium.
If you’ve been following the MLS from the beginning, like I have, you would know that this would be a tragedy. The New England Revolution are also in a similar predicament, with a lease to a stadium that neither fits their needs or their attendance to regular season games, being superfluous at best.
The article focuses on the possibility of the team being moved to St. Louis who themselves, had a deal fall through for an MLS team but looks slated to be awarded one very soon. Apparently there is no wanting for choice with regards to a stadium, as there have been three groups proposing sites and plans to build one, since then.
It always seems like other cities have more resources than San Antonio, why is that? What are some possible solutions for this dilemma? I’ll explore some of my own answers in Part II, but I want to hear some of your thoughts on the subject.
9 Comments to Our Football, Our Future: Part I
Leave a comment
-
Road Trip: Edmonton
17 May 2012 -
Scorpions On Unprecedented WIn Streak
14 May 2012 -
Tampa Bay Rowdies Looking For Revenge
11 May 2012 -
Scorpions To Host Second Round U.S. Open Cup Game
9 May 2012 -
Oh When The Crocketteers Come Marching In!
7 May 2012
- Chris Hernandez:
Pablo has scored once and has an assist. He's been... - Dark Chicharito:
You are right, it should be fun. I wonder what Ri... - Dark Chicharito:
I hope Campos wears his "lucky" shoes for this gam... - David Casarez:
The US Open follows the same format as Europe's Ch... - Dark Chicharito:
I just checked the schedule, and everybody is play...
MLS has one last spot open. And with the Spurs wanting a soccer/concert venue and if the city/county can make it a reality, I see SA being a viable spot for the MLS. But would the Spurs at that point overlook USL for the MLS?
I think SA will have to settle in the future for a relocated MLS team. (DALLAS to SA)
yeah, the relocated theory is great, think of how much work it takes to run a team and the logistics and everything already in place when they arrive and all the team has to do is concentrate on playing well i.e. Houston Dynamo.
i think that San Antonio is an attractive enough city that even the MLS will expand the number of teams allowed into the league, just to accommodate a SA based franchise. that’s if they award us a new team, but one last spot for another team would be a moot point if that team already exists; like FC Dallas, or DC United.
Great Article Andres. MLS could be a great option for San Antonio as could USL. As a fan of both I would love to see an investor take us to the MLS level. However, MLS will most likely stop at 20 teams for several years. With Montreal and most likely St. Louis as potential franchises for 19 and 20 I don’t see San Antonio being on the short list for expansion any time soon. Even with a sound investor backing a bid. That does not leave out the possibility of a team moving to San Antonio. You talked about the DC United situation and one might even include Chivas USA in that mix.
A USL franchise in the meantime may be the only option. I do hope though that the investor/operator, may that be the Spurs or someone else, puts the necessary effort to grow the franchise and make it a top notch team. I would hope the focus would be franchise development. If our city supports the building of a stadium for the team I don’t want the investor dropping the team after a few years and using the stadium exclusively as a concert venue. Don’t get me wrong I support a multi use facility because concerts bring in tons of money but I fear the focus is a stadium for concert venues and the hell with the development of the team.
I want a pro soccer team in San Antonio that wants to win a title. And an investor willing to make that happen.
Jerry Jones are you listening?
Yes Jerry Jones… pacify us with an MLS team. And hold your NFL Cowboy brand in SA. Cowboys FC… maybe another name. ALAMO SC or SA SC.
If S.A. gets an USL team, then we can forget about a MLS team. MLS will never have a division II (like Spain, England, Mexico)because it will affect the interests of the Division I teams (unless they buy USL).
S.A. made the mistake of not looking at the opportunity years ago, and now…we have to wait for other cities to fail, so we can take over. The MLS window is closing, it’s been approximately 13 years, and now it’s closing.
Sorry, I don’t want an USL team, I rather get a WPS team. I want the best, the best for the 7th largest city in the country…Is that too much to ask?
Points taken David… I’d wait for an MLS team in 5-6 years then a USL team in 1-2 years knowing the MLS won’t come.
These are questions for your mayor and Spur ownership. But maybe they don’t like the entry fee. If they have a plan for a stadium now then they are a candidate for MLS, but they have to have interest.
1. The Revs are a special case in that their owners own the stadium. The public owns 0% of it. They do not lease it.
2. You can’t say Seattle’s support in USL drew MLS. For the most part, their attendance was quite lame. It was the ownership group and the potential for a strong fanbase.
3. Rivalry with Austin in USL-1 would be interesting. The problem would be finding an appropriate place to play. Alamodome is surely too big for USL-1.
I’ve been pushed into the MLS-only camp. Too many things competing for my time and money to support semi-pro football on a high school gridiron field.
It sort of hurts to say that, but it is the truth from me.
Now, an MLS side would be a whole different beast. The downsizing of SAISD may also make for an interesting opportunity if someone wanted to work out a deal to acquire Alamo Stadium in a profit/upkeep partnership. 20,000 seats and a perfect location for MLS.